In The Wake of the Las Vegas Shooting, Republicans Rally to Restrict Women’s Rights

Last week, we suffered the worst shooting in American history. Stephen Paddock killed 58 people and injured hundreds more. As we would expect, Republicans on Capitol Hill and in the White House rallied the troops and launched into action. War has been waged on women’s rights.

Given these harsh, political realities, Republicans needed a common cause. An issue around which they could unite. Restricting women’s access to abortion and birth control is that rallying point.

In case you missed it, the House passed the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which criminalizes abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy with exceptions for instances where the life of the mother is at risk and in cases involving rape or incest. Two days after the bill’s passage, Donald Trump announced that he would roll back the employer contraception requirement. While the bill may not see the Senate floor any time soon, the roll back on contraception is a blow to family planning. Birth control is critical to the prevention of unplanned pregnancy and, until recently, generally had support from politicians on both sides of the aisle. You may remember the Republican-led effort to make certain kinds of birth control available over the counter and the slew of Republicans, including Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (no women’s rights advocate), signing contraceptive coverage laws in their states.

So, what happened?

The Republican Party took power, and the divisions among conservatives became a real problem. It is not an unusual problem. Divisions are common among politicians when their party is in power, particularly among politicians who want their constituents’ continued support. The difference here is that the Republican Party failed on a seven year promise to repeal Obamacare – repeatedly. This public failure is not inconsequential. It undermines constituents’ beliefs that Republicans – or at least establishment Republicans – can get the job done. Roy Moore’s primary victory for the U.S. Senate representing Alabama makes clear that citizens who identify as Republicans continue to take outside-the-beltway candidates with polemic positions and fiery rhetoric seriously. There don’t seem to be many opportunities for Republican unity in the future, not with immigration and tax reform looming around the corner.

Given these harsh, political realities, Republicans needed a common cause. An issue around which they could unite. Restricting women’s access to abortion and birth control is that rallying point.

The social implications of this well-worn rallying point are numerous. One, in particular warrants mentioning additional attention. Pitting women’s rights against employers’ religious beliefs sets a dangerous precedent that American employees are bound to lose. Down the political road, employers could refuse to cover a range of medications and procedure with a claim of “moral convictions,” including something as simple as blood transfusions, which some religions do not allow.

It is heartening to see Democrats and Republicans working together for a change. Gun control legislation is important, particularly when it comes to devices that allow individuals to shoot potentially human targets faster. Women’s rights to prevent and end pregnancy, however, should not be fodder in party politics.

Stop the War on Women

Posted in American Experiences, Gender, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mainstream Media and Oppositional Memes in the Digital Age

Check out Mobilizing Idea’s new essay dialogue. Here is my contribution.

Mobilizing Ideas

By Deana Rohlinger

It is an exciting and challenging time for social movements. Internet Communication Technologies (ICTs) have altered the media landscape, turning some of what we know about media-movement interactions on its head.


From The Daily Beast

View original post 956 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Dysfunctional Politics in the Digital Age

Check out my latest post on Mobilizing Ideas on Dysfunctional Politics in the Digital Age.

Mobilizing Ideas

By Deana Rohlinger

1                 2

From Pinterest                                                                         From Propcott

Something has changed in American politics. The chasm between progressives and conservatives has grown and, according to research by Shanto Iyengar and Sean Westwood, Americans have become more tribal in their politics. Americans feel a deep commitment to their ideological positions and a great deal of hostility toward their political opponents. This is bad news for social movements. Progressive and conservative causes, as well as the movements that organize around them, are caught up in this antagonism, making it more difficult than ever to capture the hearts and minds of the citizenry. Political consensus seems to be a thing of the past and reasoned conversations about important political issues virtually extinct.

View original post 997 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Turning the Anti-Abortion Tide

By Deana A Rohlinger The Supreme Court’s Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt ruling effectively renders unconstitutional abortion restrictions in some two-dozen states, forcing abortion opponents t…

Source: Turning the Anti-Abortion Tide

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Turning the Anti-Abortion Tide

Check out my latest piece in The American Prospect.

For the first time since the Supreme Court’s landmark Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton rulings established a constitutional right to an abortion in 1973, pro-life advocates find themselves squarely on the losing side of a watershed legal decision.

The high court’s dramatic 5-3 ruling in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt upends laws in two-dozen states around the country that have imposed abortion restrictions comparable to those struck by the court on June 27. In a ruling that cemented the importance of its decades-old finding that states may not impose an “undue burden” on women seeking abortions, the Court rejected a Texas law that had mandated that clinics meet the standards of hospitals, and that their personnel have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals.

The Texas requirements had slashed the number of clinics offering abortion in the state by more than half, yet the high court could find “no significant health-related problem that the new law helped to cure” wrote Justice Stephen Breyer in the Court’s majority opinion.

“We agree with the District Court that the surgical-center requirement, like the admitting-privileges requirement, provides few, if any, health benefits for women, poses a substantial obstacle to women seeking abortions, and constitutes an ‘undue burden’ on their constitutional right to do so,” Breyer wrote.

With that, the Court changed the contours of the abortion battle, and dropped pro-life advocates into unfamiliar territory. For decades, the pro-choice movement has been on the defensive and losing ground in the abortion war, particularly as Texas and other states rushed to embrace onerous clinic restrictions known as Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP) laws.

Read more here.

Posted in Gender, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Social Media and the Sit-in

Check out my interview with Epoch Times on the role social media played in the sit-in.

“Without platforms like Periscope and Facebook live, Americans may not have learned about—or witnessed—this political protest,” said Deana Rohlinger, professor of sociology at Florida State University.

“Democrats took advantage of the right technology at the right political moment. Support for gun control legislation is high in America and, given the recent tragedies, it is the right political moment for Democrats to push for change,” Rohlinger said.

Read more here.

Posted in Mass Media, Mass Media and News, Politics | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Truth about Writing an Academic Book

The thought of publishing a book is very seductive. A book offers the opportunity to explain ideas in detail. For some, it signifies an academic arrival. Once you publish a book, you are officially part of the knowledge production machine, you have a compelling way to engage the conversation. My book, on abortion politics [Abortion Politics, Mass Media, and Social Movements in America], was meant to be that.

But this story is not about the intensity of the topic, but the intensity of the book. I love my book. I am proud of it. But the process stunned me. It took four years for my book to get published (from the initial submission to its publication) and I had almost no contact with my editor during the revision or publication process. I learned that the reality of publishing a book does not always live up to the Hollywood montage that plays out in our minds. This may sound obvious…but it surprised me.

When I am asked to give advice on writing a book, I answer: You need to be practical about your book. Here are a few things to consider when you get serious about moving a book from the montage in your mind to reality. Read the rest here

Posted in Academic Life, Teaching, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments